Sunday, January 29, 2012

Essay 1:Letter to U.S. Secretary of Education


Essay 1: Thoughts on Civic Literacy

            I wrote this essay as a letter to Arne Duncan, the U.S. Secretary of Education.  Duncan, appointed by President Barack Obama, heads up the U.S. Department of Education.  The language I used is appropriate for the formality necessary in addressing one of the president’s cabinetry members.  My tone conveys concern for the state of education in this country and I used the articles and studies we’ve read so far to back up my claims.

Secretary Arne Duncan,

            As technology, media, and culture affect large changes in our society, our educational system must adapt and transform along with.  Over the past decades, our society has seen many new developments.  The Internet and the computer were some of the most influential inventions of the 20th century.  Their creation and expansion up to this point have created millions of jobs, innovative ways of sharing and storing information, and new methods of communication. 
Nicholas Carr writes in his article Is Google Making Us Stupid? about the creation of the printing press, “Hieronimo Squarciafico worried that the easy availability of books would lead to intellectual laziness, making men “less studious” and weakening their minds.” (7)  Carr goes on to quote that these concerns were mostly correct but the ‘doomsayers’ were unable to predict the vast benefits of the press.  Without reservation, I’d argue that computer technology has brought us to a further civilized state and its benefits are infinite.  At the same time, however, it is changing how we access and receive information.  Many printed newspapers have gone out of business; others have had to change their business strategy to stay afloat.  One of the largest bookstore chains, Borders, filed for bankruptcy and liquidated its assets.  It was unable to keep up with online book sales and e-books.  These occurrences reflect large changes in our society. 
We’ve become a culture obsessed with TV and computer screens.  Recent generations figure out how to play a game on an iPhone years before they are able to read.  Older generations are changing the way they intake information.  While the past required that lengthy research be completed, the present provides information with the click of a mouse button.  The ability we have to access so much information with ease is making us lazy.  Carr quotes Bruce Friedman, ““I can’t read War and Peace anymore,” he admitted. “I’ve lost the ability to do that. Even a blog post of more than three or four paragraphs is too much to absorb. I skim it.” (2)  But what do these changes mean for the education of our youth?  With the creation of the printing press, more people had access to books and the literacy of the world grew exponentially.  With the creation of the Internet and more access to articles, statistics, facts and information, literacy should have again gone up.  This isn’t the case for our society and many around the world.  The Internet isn’t the problem but how we use it is.  Chris Hedges writes in his article America the Illiterate, “There are over 42 million American adults, 20 percent of whom hold high school diplomas, who cannot read, as well as the 50 million who read at a fourth- or fifth-grade level. Nearly a third of the nation’s population is illiterate or barely literate. And their numbers are growing by an estimated 2 million a year.” (1)  The Internet is having a profound effect on the literacy of this country in particular.  We cannot go back and eliminate the web, nor would we want to.  It has had uncountable benefits for our society.
Our educational systems have to adapt to confront the problems that the Internet has created in our society.  As the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education, I have no doubt that you are confronted with problems in our public educational system every day.  As congress allocates trillions of tax dollars to the military and other sectors of government, education is often given the leftovers.  As the U.S. loses many of its manufacturing jobs to China and other countries, we must focus on creating smart individuals.  Without doing this, the U.S. will continue to lessen its importance in the world.  Our public education system must begin to create a larger number of engaged and inspired students.  The problem currently is that the way high school teachers are teaching subjects doesn’t line up with way students are learning information elsewhere.  The way that classes are taught has changed very little over the past century.  Teachers must forget the traditional methods of teaching and create new methods to engage with their students.
High school students are no lazier today than those of the past.  It can be argued that they have more distractions but mostly they are used to accessing information fast and moving through it as quick as their Internet connection.  Its impossible to expect that a brain trained to intake information in that way will do well reading a 20 page long article.  Information on the Internet is summarized down to what is useful.  For most of us, minus the journalism majors and law students, that’s completely acceptable. 
If teachers want to inspire their students, they must stop teaching them the way that they were taught.  Clive Thompson writes in his article Clive Thompson on the New Literacy about Andrea Lunsford’s study of Stanford Students, “The first thing she found is that young people today write far more than any generation before them.” (1)  Most of the writing students do today is over texts, facebook messages and writing online.  This writing is different from the writing in a formal research paper but it is not less important.  Lunsford explained in her study, “The fact that students today almost always write for an audience (something virtually no one in my generation did) gives them a different sense of what constitutes good writing. In interviews, they defined good prose as something that had an effect on the world. For them, writing is about persuading and organizing and debating, even if it's over something as quotidian as what movie to go see. The Stanford students were almost always less enthusiastic about their in-class writing because it had no audience but the professor: It didn't serve any purpose other than to get them a grade.” (1)  If teachers gave their students a sense of purpose in their writing, they would find their students engaging and learning more.  I don’t mean to say that teachers are the problem.  Rather the system is currently the problem and the teachers can be the solution.  As human beings, we must feel as though we have a strong purpose.  Even in the small example of writing an essay, if the purpose is something more than getting a good grade, students will put more effort into their work.
With the creation of blogging, online forums and chat rooms, the spread of information has become more of a conversation.  While people used to read the same newspaper or watch the nightly news everyday for their information, people today can access information wherever links take them.  People are faced with more perspectives and faster updates on news stories.  What information they are given is not always true but many don’t take the time to verify it.  Most Internet users don’t read past the headlines if they even get to a news related site.  Other information is passed through their friends and acquaintances on sites like Facebook.  Chris Hedges writes in his article America the Illiterate, “In an age of images and entertainment, in an age of instant emotional gratification, we do not seek or want honesty. We ask to be indulged and entertained.” (2)  Much of the U.S. population isn’t prepared to sift through articles and read for hours, making their own opinions.  Most of them get their opinions from the images and propaganda that they are faced with.  Education today must face these issues if it wants to create engaged citizens.  There are ways for teachers to show their students how to involve themselves in the online conversations and I imagine those students will learn more from doing that than they would in skimming a long article.  Blogs and forums can be great sources of information for students.  They are able to see all perspectives and can find links to websites that back up the information they are presented with.  It won’t all be true, but if taught correctly, students will figure out how to learn on their own.
Teachers right now are given all the responsibility for what students must learn.  They are required to assign articles, textbook excerpts, and give out tests.  All of which perpetuates the idea that all students need to learn is what their teachers tell them to.  In an era of technology with so much information immediately accessible, teachers must stop telling students what to learn and instead teach them how.  To create engaged citizens and smart individuals in this country, teachers must focus and teaching younger generations how to use the Internet effectively.  A lot of teenager’s lives currently revolve around technology but that doesn’t have to be a bad thing.  In altering the system, we can morph using the Internet into a productive, learning activity.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Reflection


I reflect upon my writing in a warm light.  I think that as long as I am involving myself in some sort of writing, I’m challenging my abilities and improving as a writer.  To be honest, the hardest part about working on these posts is completing them by 2:00 the day before.  The pattern that I’ve gotten into with doing my homework for most classes doesn’t match up with that, and I often forget to post until the night before.  Other than that, I have begun to love blogging.  Its far different from any other types of writing I have done and it allows me to blab about things I’m interested in.  The articles we’re reading are of interest to me and when I sit down to write about them, I can go on forever.  I’m constantly surprised by the information in these articles and it even gives me things to talk about with my peers.  I’ve always been interested in current events and what problems our society is facing.  Having a place to express my concerns is necessary and blogger works perfectly for that.  Its great feeling that I don’t have to write in a formal manner and my thoughts can flow freely.  Blogging is almost like having a conversation with the world and I’m surprised how much I like it.  At the beginning of this class I remember thinking that I had lost my touch with current events.  In high school I had kept up on them for classes but since then I hadn’t had a need.  I remember setting a goal that with this class I would begin to get back into that.  Without a doubt my web habits have changed due to that.  I frequent news sites and even watch The Daily Show on comedy central to stay in tune with the things we are talking about in this class.  Even last night, watching The Colbert Report I saw Andrew Sullivan talking with Steven Colbert.  Knowing some background on him kept me interested in the show.  We’re not even halfway through the quarter yet and I already feel like I have completed my greatest goal for the class.

Facebook has a purpose!?


In an article the length that Hedges would have described as unable to keep our attention, Scribner took a different approach on literacy that was different from previous articles.  In addition, Thompson’s article approached the subject with an optimistic perspective.  The tones in these pieces were quite the opposite of Hedges and Carr’s works.  Scribner addresses how literacy is defined and tested.  She talks about how the definition of literacy in this country changes over time and is not static.  Scribner says literacy takes on three metaphors: Literacy as Adaptation, Literacy as Power, and Literacy as a State of Grace.  She is stating that literacy can change in its meaning, that literate people often hold power in the society and that we look upon literate people with admiration.  The last metaphor was slightly confusing to me.  Thompson goes on to address how literacy has changed in our society and talks about how we might be getting more literate.  In the Stanford study that he cites, thousands of student works were examined with the conclusion that students have a better sense of whom they are writing to today.  With so many out of class uses for writing, students have a better idea of their audience.  I found this interesting and very believable.  Looking back on my blog posts from this quarter, I hardly recognize my own writing.  Having never written on a blog before, I’m not used to the audience that I now have.  I don’t notice it when I’m writing, it must be subconscious, but I definitely change my writing style to adapt to the new form.  Many students across the country do not attend Stanford and plenty don’t even attend college.  Those that do, have been taught how to write by numerous teachers.  My concern is with those that do not have competent teachers and cannot write in any form besides the way they text and chat on facebook.  As the Stanford study presented, those ways of writing do help us in finding our audience but not if they are the only ways one writes.

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Illiteracy and stupidity both have no limits

After having just talked about how the Internet has changed our way of thinking, I would also like to applaud Hedges's brevity.  He said what he needed to say without rambling.  My mind, having been changed over the past years by the Internet and Google, appreciated this.
I wrote this idea down after having read Hedges's first two sentences:
What scares me to think about is that the "majority America" Hedges's talks about takes headline news summaries and snippets of information that they find on the Internet as holding the same amount of truth that an in-depth news article holds.  This, in my opinion, is what has begun to make politics in America such a difficult affair.  Both sides hold firm beliefs in what they hear from their leaders that they don't do much thinking for themselves.  They rarely back facts up with credible information; instead they act as brainwashed zombies out to defend their radical viewpoints to the death.
Upon reading the rest of the article, I was delighted to find how in tune my fears are with Hedges's.  It appalls me to think that the only way to win an election in this country is to manipulate people with fear, propaganda and images but it is clearly becoming true.  No matter how few skeletons you have in your closet, how intelligent you are, how great your ideas are or how much experience you have, if you run a campaign that fails to advertise and publicize correctly, you have no chance of winning an election.
Hedges’s definition of literacy goes beyond the dictionary definition.  It’s not just about being able to read but it goes past that and deals with how one takes in information, certifies that it is correct and uses it in their life.  The illiterate in American society don’t just not know how to read but they are blatantly stupid as well.  This viewpoint of Hedges’s is one that I would completely agree with.  The masses of people in this country that can be manipulated by imagery and propaganda are what I’m most scared of.
Reading about how The Princeton Review did a study on the level of language used in political debates was appalling.  Not wanting to be like the illiterate masses, I made an attempt to check if this information was correct.  I couldn’t find the original study but I found another article by Diane Ravitch that used the same information: http://www.hoover.org/news/daily-report/25413. Assuming that this study was done accurately, even if the numbers are slightly off, there has obviously been a significant change in how politicians interact with their constituents.  This is yet another example of how our country as a whole is losing intelligence.  I’d even argue that high schools have gotten so bad that they provide the level of educational development that middle schools once provided.  

Genius has its limits, but stupidity has none


As I read Carr's article I begin to think of my last post on Harris's piece.  I began the post saying that he managed to write a considerable amount about very little and it was quite boring.  As I think about Carr's points and the reading I've been doing lately, it might not be the fault of Harris after all.  It seems as I read anything that lasts longer than a few pages on one topic, I find my brain drifting off.  I still read the words on the page but my mind doesn't process them.  I instead think about what I'm doing later, if I'm hungry or tired and what interesting things I could go look up on the Internet.  The web provides us with so much immediate information.  I don't read ten pages about something when someone else can summarize it in a paragraph.  Unless required by a class, I don't even open books anymore.  All through middle school I read lengthy novels, even The Da Vinci Code.  I doubt I'd be able to read a quarter of that now.
Even as I was reading this article, I found my mind drifting off after the fourth page.  The first half of the article I was immersed in it and finding connections it had to my life.  By the second half, I was bored of the idea and wanted to move on to a new one.  This is crazy to think about and I'm in complete agreement with Carr's point.  The Internet is decreasing our attention spans and increasing human stupidity exponentially.  The web has made our thought process similar to the way a political debate operates.  Our brains only have so much time to spend on one idea as a politician only gets a limited amount of time to say what he must.  Once the time is up, the topic must switch.  
The answer Carr gives, that are way of thinking is being altered, matches up with the notes we shared on our Internet usage.  Even those of my classmates that spent time on news sites spent only a short amount of time there.  You could see their brains jumping from topic to topic as they changed URL’s and monitored facebook.  I agree with Carr that were heading down a dark road.  I have good memories of being able to sit down on a Saturday and read an entire book.  I remember it almost being a competition of who could finish the new Harry Potter book the fastest.  This is incomprehensible to me today and I wonder if future generations of children will even be able to experience that.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Re-Interpreting Harris's Rewriting


I need to start off by saying that Joseph Harris has a way of saying what he needs to say with a few too many words.  I felt as if I understood his point the first time he stated it and gave an example.  That said, there was plenty to learn from his writing.  Harris defined writing in a way that connected it closely with reading.  He started off in the introduction by saying that most academic writing pieces are responses to the works of others.  I interpreted this as him saying that as writers we must be readers.  We need to use the work of others to form our own perspectives and viewpoints.
Harris says, “My advice here is to imagine yourself as rewriting – as drawing from, commenting on, adding to – the work of others.”  This advice that he offers, connects authors closely with one another.  The way that he presents it, it is as if non-fiction authors cannot and should not create works without reference to another authors work.  This is not simply because written pieces aren’t as relevant or beneficial without connections to others.  It also ties in to the purpose of writing itself.  In writing, we are presenting our ideas to others but before we do that we are formulating new ideas ourselves.  This sparks us to think more in depth about a subject, using others ideas and progressing beyond them.
In looking at how this connects to Sullivan’s “Why I Blog,” I came up with a major similarity.  Blogging, as Sullivan puts it serves the purpose of connecting the author with the reader.  The way Harris describes coming to terms with another writers work is much the same.  Harris explains that in writing, an author needs to use others pieces and develop our own thoughts.  In reading a blog you can comment back to the author or link them directly on your blog.  It is easy to quote other blogs; something Harris emphasizes is crucial to rewriting.  Blogging seems the ideal way to come to terms with others ideas and expand off of them.

Internet Distractions


Looking at the lists that my classmates made of their Internet usage, I found them to contain few necessary uses.  On most occasions I saw my classmates using the Internet for pointless endeavors that wasted their time.  I was surprised at how much time was spent on nothing.  One explanation for this could be that they were trying to have something to put in their notes and thus boosted their usage of the common facebook and twitter… I know that’s what I did.  This can hardly be true for our entire class, however, as much as I regret it, our generation is on the web way too much.
Ever since society could access it, the Internet has been used by billions of people around the globe.  This website that I found shows the statistics on the amount of people accessing the web: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm . Somewhat to my surprise only 30% of the world population has ever had access but I suppose that was an ignorant point of view that I held.  Regardless, that’s over two billion people that have the opportunity to view almost any piece of information to exist.  (Minus countries like china, which have restricted access)
With so much information out there to view, I think we as a society have reached the point where we are overwhelmed.  Our generation especially reverts back to using the Internet for only a few websites.  I for one open my laptop expecting to Google something awesome and learn something new but this never happens.  Laziness gets the better of me.  On good days I skim the front page of the New York Times, which remains my homepage.  Other days I click right to the link I have for facebook.  When I find nothing interesting there, my Internet usage is over.  This is what I found my classmates to be doing as well, nothing…
This isn’t much of a surprise after looking at the statistics on the most visited websites in the U.S.: http://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/US
My conclusion: We as a society generally use the Internet with the intention of accomplishing nothing.  Its there when we really need it, but mainly its there all the times we don’t… just to waste our time.

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Junk I Get Myself to Look at on the Internet


Monday

PM
-       1:55 – went on facebook
o   checked notifications
-       1:57 – college humor
o   read funny articles
-       7:45 – went on facebook
o   checked notifications
o   chatted with a friend
-       7:50 – cool material
o   looked at daily posts of stuff
-       7:52 – nytimes
o   read front page articles

Tuesday

AM
-       1:25 – checked facebook
o   looked for notifications, found none
-       1:30 – hulu check new videos to watch
o   found nothing and went to bed
-       9:03 – webcentral
o   checked schedule
-       9:05 – blackboard
o   checked homework
-       9:10 – email

PM
-       4:27 – webcentral
o   added money to flex
-       9:47 – facebook
o   read timeline full of somewhat useless information about friends activities and emotions
-       9:54 – blogger
o   posted this

Sunday, January 8, 2012

Interpretation of Sullivan's 'Why I Blog'


Reading this article was an eye opener.  I've come to think of the Internet as a brick wall cutting off human connections.  Though as a whole, the Internet is an excellent source for information, sites like Facebook actually prevent people from connecting on a deeply human level.  Birthday wishes are given over a few quick words on someone’s wall and emotions are left out of many conversations.  Reading this article, however, I gained a perspective on how the Internet can lead to deeper connections.  In how the news is reported by major newspapers, emotions are left out the majority of the time.  Author’s opinions are placed at far less value than the facts.  Sullivan says, “For bloggers, the deadline is always now. Blogging is therefore to writing what extreme sports are to athletics: more free-form, more accident-prone, less formal, more alive. It is, in many ways, writing out loud.”  Blogging allows for emotions to come out instantly, without time to edit them out.  It is an immediate stream of perspectives that readers can view to enter the author’s thoughts.  In addition, blogging allows for a conversation between writers and their readers.  Those reading a blog can comment back, add to the conversation and present new sources.  This brings about an intimacy between humans that isn’t present in reading a newspaper.  Sullivan describes this intimacy as friendship and I couldn’t agree more.  Before blogs, many people with literary talent had no outlet for their writing.  Now that it is provided, expression can happen at any time of the day and without the approval of publishers and editors.  Any expression can be posted on a blog for everyone to read.  What Sullivan says about linking stuck out to me.  I realized how the way sources are used has changed.  Where journalists of the past hid their sources from other journalists and news reporters, bloggers today link them right in a post.  This allows readers to fact check for themselves and develop their own perspectives.  It become harder for information to be skewed and allows for more truth in the flow of news.  Though many arguments occur in the comments section and between different blogs, it allows for the reader to view both sides of a story.  This article brought me to reconsider the purpose of the Internet and how humans have grown to rely on it.  As Sullivan said, though blogs don’t always offer truth, they provide opinions, differing perspectives and human intimacy.

Creating the Blog


Making this blog was simple and quick.  I’m surprised that I have never heard of Blogger before but it seems like an easy tool to express your ideas.  The way that written expression has changed over the past two decades is incredible.  It has become so simple for anyone to create a blog and begin to develop a following.  I’m glad that sites like this are out there, allowing for discussions to take place.